Twitter.com e-edition subscribe online Chippewa.com

Advertisement


WXPort
Click here to view Wisconsin Weather Radar

Updated Jan 02, 2009 - 19:29:55 CST

Web Search
powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

Herald Archives
adv search

News

Who Makes Your Day?

Calling College Graduates!












Sand mine, plant raise controversy during 2008




A proposal for a sand mine in the town of Howard and a sand processing plant in Chippewa Falls mined controversy for the better part of 2008.

The ongoing story was chosen as the Herald’s top local news story of 2008.

Canadian Sand and Proppant’s plans for a $60 million construction project of a sand processing facility in Chippewa Falls were announced May 29.

The newly incorporated company with ties to a Canadian firm planned to mine a particular kind of sand from Chippewa and Barron County locations and truck it to the processing plant. There, it would be washed and separated by grain size, then shipped out by rail for use in fracturing oil and natural gas wells in North America.

The plant was to employ about 20 people to start, the addition of 15 new jobs in a few years, plus perhaps 15 more jobs for truck drivers, excavation equipment operators and rail workers.

Almost immediately, the plans became controversial.

Officials in the town of Howard, where the sand was to be mined, quickly passed an ordinance to restrict mining activities in the township.

Citizens appeared at meetings in Howard to object to the proposed mine, citing fears of air and water pollution, dangerous levels of truck traffic, destruction of roads, lowering of property values and other concerns.

Opponents were not reassured by company arguments that there was not reason to fear air or water pollution.

It was unclear whether the town of Howard would grant Canadian Sand and Proppant a permit under its new ordinance, but in the fall, the company stopped pursuing a permit. The company, agreeing with an analysis from Chippewa County officials, claimed the town’s ordinance was invalid, as it was in effect a zoning law that requires county board approval.

The town claims its ordinance is valid and is prepared to file an injunction stopping any mining activity that commences without a permit.

Meanwhile, controversy heated up in Chippewa Falls, as opposition arose to the processing plant itself.

That controversy will spill over to 2009 as a lawsuit filed Nov. 14 against the Chippewa Falls Plan Commission and brought by the Concerned Chippewa Citizens winds its way through the legal system.

And there could be fallout politically, as four City Council members and Mayor Greg Hoffman will be up for election in April.

City Planner Jayson Smith said unless the lawsuit changes things, Canadian Sand and Proppant has all the city permits the company needs to go ahead with the building of a sand processing plant on the northeast side of Chippewa Falls, near the Lake Wissota Business Park.

The key issue in the lawsuit is the Oct. 27 granting on a voice vote of a conditional use permit by the city’s Plan Commission.

Canadian Sand and Proppant needed the permit to build structures higher than the city’s 60-foot height restriction. Silos on the plant site are set to be 96 feet tall.

Over 50 people turned up at the council’s meeting Nov. 18 to protest the Plan Commission’s decision.

Attorney Glenn Stoddard of Eau Claire, the lawyer representing Concerned Chippewa Citizens, that night outlined the lawsuit’s objectives:

n The lawsuit claims the Plan Commission went outside its jurisdiction in granting the permit;

n The lawsuit asks that the city be required to appoint a new Plan Commission;

n And the lawsuit would require the city’s Board of Appeals to hear a zoning variance.

The issue of whether the city should approve a developer’s agreement with Canadian Sand about the plant drew an overflow crowd to the council chambers Dec. 16. Both the council chambers and the adjacent hallway were full of opponents of the processing plant.

Twenty opponents spoke to the council, urging the defeat of the measure. Gary Stone, manager of the proposed plant, said the site will see an average of 250 trucks and 21 railroad cars a day.

In the end, council members Greg Dachel, Robert Hoekstra and council President Dennis Doughty voted for the developer’s agreement, while Jack Covill, Brian Flynn and Susan Zukowski voted against. Council member Jason Anderson voted present, leaving the decision to break the tie to Mayor Greg Hoffman.

He voted yes and the $1.75 million revenue bond for the project was approved.

Canadian Sand and Proppant will be responsible for repaying the bond in installments between 2011 and 2020.



PLEASE NOTE:

Comments on stories that are updated may disappear with each update. The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Chippewa Herald.

COMMENTS:

watchdog wrote on Jan 14, 2009 5:52 PM:

" The motives of those involved have been in question and continue to be monitored. "

ALPINE wrote on Jan 12, 2009 4:49 PM:

" This is exactly what I have been told by two landowners, one of them a very large landowner who was on board to sell to the sand company from the start. They were at a meeting this past week with the company and they were told that after more testing it's been determined that they have the wrong kind of sand and there is no interest in it. I assume that will include the whole townships of Howard and Cooks Valley, where these two are located. If this is the case the company had to know this from the start.

I ask the moderators to look into this please. If it is completely false let us know. If it is true this story changes in a heart beat and the motives of the company are in question. "

watchdog wrote on Jan 12, 2009 3:01 PM:

" Alpine, I have a bridge to no where you might be interested in. "

ALPINE wrote on Jan 9, 2009 5:15 PM:

" NEWS FLASH --

I'm not kidding, I do have an update. I have learned from a very credible source that it appears that there will be no landowners anywhere in Chippewa County profiting from this "project". After all of this, the sand company is now saying that it is the WRONG KIND OF SAND! Nobody has the right kind of sand. The company had to know this all along. They just want to process sand that is railed in from other areas and they have picked this area. I hope this info is wrong, but again, I got it from a very reliable source. "

yepper wrote on Jan 7, 2009 4:06 PM:

" To cclover,
I see what you mean.... I'm a disaster because I don't agree with them. The sky is falling and we are all doomed! "

cclover wrote on Jan 7, 2009 3:08 PM:

" To Yepper

I guess that only comments that agree with their point of view are welcome. Quick run tell the King, the sky is falling. "

Dusty wrote on Jan 7, 2009 2:22 PM:

" All the propant projects in the area have been at least initially represented by the same salesman. Mel is pictured at the top of this article. There are good reasons for forming a new corporation for each project. "

yepper wrote on Jan 7, 2009 8:43 AM:

" I guess I just find it funny that you people let COMMENTS get you so worked up. "

sandyclaws wrote on Jan 6, 2009 10:38 PM:

" Yepper.......you are so far away from the truth that it is SAD! People here want progress, carefully selected industry, educated people who have skills to do productive, healthy work, a good environment and a safe clean space to raise their children and retire here as well. I think you should go back to where you came from and forget selling sand as a sideline. Your values profess greed and an unhealthy attitude about how to make yourself a success. People of your ilk are not welcomed here. You should be ashamed of your very poor attitude and your treatment of people. It is obvious that in your viewpoint, YOU come before any others. What a disaster you are! "

yepper wrote on Jan 6, 2009 3:04 PM:

" I was born and raised here. Moved away and then back some years ago. I still have the same feelings I've always had....Chippewa residents want their little town to be just like "Walnut Grove" Horse and buggy cruising through the prairie!!! "

Sand-Blaster wrote on Jan 5, 2009 5:56 AM:

" Quoting *cclover wrote on Jan 4, 2009 9:09 PM:

" All the Chicken Littles are out cackling again. We are all doomed. "*

Perhaps you are not familiar with "Presto Ind."
Or "WR&R" (I worked there some 26 years ago). If you knew some of the TOXIC GARBAGE they stored/handled....
Or "Perrenoud's Pit" (although I have no proof of contaminated water from Perrenoud's Pit).... The water from the well at the home my sister & family (and several neighbors) lived was Stinky, Discolored, Nauseating *Expletive* .... their property bordered that DUMP. "

cclover wrote on Jan 4, 2009 9:09 PM:

" All the Chicken Littles are out cackling again. We are all doomed. "

watchdog wrote on Jan 4, 2009 4:13 PM:

" I hope everyone in the area has good medical insurance. Cancer risks from diesel emissions are substantial. Do your research. Your health is your most valuable asset. "

Sand-Blaster wrote on Jan 4, 2009 10:43 AM:

" Well...Well...
*The folks at CS&P must be sitting in their easy-chairs LAUGHING at (some of) the 'posters' here BICKERING. And "throwing" Daggers, Mud & ?? at one another.
*(IF) CS&P is going to do business here ...
*(We) as responsible citizens MUST ensure they do more than meet "minimum standards" of the DNR/EPA/Zoning/Etc.
*If our elected officials/representatives do not do as we desire... REPLACE THEM!! "

Stinger wrote on Jan 4, 2009 1:14 AM:

" NIABY,

Deep breathes! Remember you are a passivist! And I do LOVE, the person who buys me a drink so I can forget about how nasty of a world we live in. Sorry I got you so upset baby! "

NIABY wrote on Jan 3, 2009 11:13 PM:

" Hey Stinger. You said, "I told a friend of mine after hearing that Dunn County voted this down that they would just move it over to Chippewa Falls." You know something we don't know? Canadian Sand and Proppant keeps saying they're not the same outfit as Proppant Specialists that got sent packing from Dunn County. They sure have a lot "old company connections" in common though don't they? You got insider information? "

NIABY wrote on Jan 3, 2009 4:47 PM:

" Whoa Stinger! You sure make a lot of assumptions about people you dont' know. To keep me from rudely doing the same about you, please clarify: You are opposed to citizen participation in government? You are in favor of hopeless submission to greed, exploitation, and injustice? You find concepts of peace and love worthy of your disdain? You think anyone who isn't as eager as you to submit to the ills of the world must be unaware of those realities? Man, you sound beat up and defeated. "

Stinger wrote on Jan 3, 2009 3:39 PM:

" Staying with the Caddyshack theme, all this saving the planet with pure energy and pure intentions reminds me of the failed scheme to breed Kentucky Blue Grass with California Sensimilla. NIABY and Sandyclaws have been smoking the former if they think that alternative energy will be controlled differently than fossil fuels. They probably think that the Great Obama also has pure intentions and is not influenced by power and money. I think their savior picked a bad year to try to quit smoking. The sooner that our "Peace & Love" twins below figure out that the world is controlled by powerful forces that revolve around the almighty buck, the sooner they'll hit the Sensimilla even harder and just accept reality through their escape from reality. "

sandyclaws wrote on Jan 3, 2009 2:44 PM:

" NIABY: you are absolutely right on!! Thank you for saying it just the "right" way. The monikers who believe harvesting silica sand so they can line their own pockets with billionds are old fashioned foggies who haven't seen the light of day in regard to the new thinking about alternative energy sources, ways of preserving our earth, and looking at the world as a future place for generations to live. Talk about greed! It is surrounding us right here in Chippewa Falls. Keeping the masses down from discussing the topic, withholding information, holding office for personal benefit, and listening to snake oil salesmen and believing their line of promises.........are all elements of deceiving the people so eager for more understanding of what can be done to save our city from this form of destruction. "

cclover wrote on Jan 3, 2009 2:17 PM:

" To NIABY
Isn't perception a wonderful thing? "

NIABY wrote on Jan 3, 2009 1:49 PM:

" Afraid of change? True. People tend to be. In the case of this Sand Plant though, looks like the ones embracing it are the afraid ones. Afraid of a world that needs to change away from Oil, away from resource depletion, away from huge profits for those who exploit and pollute our planet, away from citizen apathy and towards greater citizen involvement. It seems to me the ones fighting the Sand Plant, are the ones least afraid of embracing the changes we have to make. They are the ones recognizing we can't keep doing things the same old way, certainly not without a careful examination of all the possible consequences. The Sand Plant is not change. It is more of the same old way of doing things. "

8588 wrote on Jan 2, 2009 2:41 PM:

" I have to agree with Alpine when saying that people do not like change. People resist change instead of embrassing it. I also have no interest in this Sand project nor do I believe it will do the damage to CF that many people fear. Chippewa Falls and the surrounding area are a very nice place to live. You who live there are the lucky ones. Some day I hope to be back in the area. "

alpine wrote on Jan 2, 2009 9:57 AM:

" I was born in Chippewa County and have lived in Chippewa County all of my years. I have also travelled the world and every corner of this country for work and pleasure (mostly work). This is truly one of the finest areas in the world to live in considering all and this area has a great history, a history to be proud of. I do not believe this sand mine operartion will change any of that. People are afraid of change, it tends to be the nature of most. The DOT has given the truck traffic the OK, the county and city are not going to stop the process, and the DNR seems to be ready to issue full permits. You can organize any kind of a mob with burning torches you want to but that's not going to stop anything. I have no interest in this project at all but I can see that it will be in full swing by the time we celibrate another new year..... "

faithful citizen wrote on Jan 2, 2009 9:24 AM:

" We need to stop looking at the negative things in this community and start looking at the positive. Every town has eye-sores. Every town has parts that are the greatest, but here in Chippewa Falls, we have so many more positive things. We have unbelievable parks, might I mention free parks, we have great schools, we have low crime, we have a community that I feel proud to be a part of. I constantly talk to people from other parts of the country who tell me their dream would be to retire here. We get to live in this tranquil community every day. If people think it is so bad, they should move to a better place, if one exists. Let's start this year out right and focus on the positive things Chippewa Falls has to offer and stop making it negative, we are the only ones who will make this a mining town. It's here, we need to work on things that will beautify this city even more. Let's help keep this city the place where people would want to retire. "

Stinger wrote on Jan 2, 2009 6:14 AM:

" Jeepers, Omnipotent may actually be right for the first time? I've lived here my whole life and now I think I need to take a long shower with my clothes on! All joking aside, Chippewa Falls is no different than most communities. We all have tainted pasts of old boy greed and dishonorable behavior in the name of progress. There is sometimes a fine line between honoring our city fathers and locking them up. The smart ones just leave town. At least there was a close vote before the Canadians won. Who knows, maybe with the millions they will make off of us, they will sponsor a few youth hockey leagues? That will calm down a few of you environmentally concerned hockey moms. Accept the fact that this is a done deal! I told a friend of mine after hearing that Dunn County voted this down that they would just move it over to Chippewa Falls. I hate when I am right and Omnipotent looks omnipotent. I fear these are all signs of the Apocalypse. If I spelled it right, that is another sign. "

rosenqef wrote on Jan 1, 2009 6:23 PM:

" This comment is directed towards Omnipotent. I appreciate your comment about me being a "highly educated community activist," but I agree that the world needs ditch diggers, as well. I worked in a factory for three and a half years, worked on the maintenance crew of a nearby golf course for two years, and salted deer hides in the winters while in high school. Here's what I stand for: businesses that pay its employees well without sacrificing a safe and healthy environment. You're right - we need jobs. This doesn't mean that we'll just take any jobs, though. "

Concerned Taxpayer wrote on Jan 1, 2009 2:53 PM:

" The 20 jobs that this plant will create (and the possible 15-30 more jobs for truck drivers, etc) is not worth the many negatiave effects that this plant and the related mines will have on Chippewa Falls and the surrounding area. We planned to retire here, in a picturesque and quiet community, but are holding off building our dream home on Lake Wissota until we find out if this thing really goes through. What a shame if it does, as there will be many like us who will choose to live elsewhere, away from the truck traffic, noise and associated pollution, and thus not pay property taxes to Chippewa County.

Wait until the planned "phase 2" happens, has anyone recently smelled the resin that they will use to "treat" the sand? It only gets worse....

The elected officials need to wake up and do what is best for the majority of its residents, and stop this thing from happening. Once it's built, there is no turning back. "

Omnipotent wrote on Jan 1, 2009 2:41 PM:

" As Judge Smails would say, “Well I guess it’s time, I guess it’s time! Where did you get your business degree, Mr. Expert on Business Mentality? Bushwood Community College? All I can say when I read posts from highly educated community activists: the world needs ditch diggers too. Well, actually when the latest monument to Chippewa greed is erected you can dig in the world’s biggest sand box? Now don’t take this too hard! Come on, let me buy you a Fresca! "

rosenqef wrote on Jan 1, 2009 1:27 PM:

" Well, I guess it's about time for a community to put a stop to this tradition and forge a new mentality about what business ought to accomplish. "

Omnipotent wrote on Jan 1, 2009 10:25 AM:

" This community has always embraced the sleazy and fast way to make a buck. First it was a major fur trading post. "A bottle of Whiskey and some pretty beads for your 5 beaver pelts?" Then the great Weyerhaeuser and his captains (Rutledge & Irvine) came to the area and deforested the landscape. The beer, bars and brothels followed. From the early 20th Century until the 1960s, all manner of manufacturing polluters set up shop along the banks of our river and Duncan Creek. I wish the great flood in the 1930s had washed them all to Hades. Then we made computers that guided nuclear missiles for decades. So Rosenqf and all you anti-sand mine people, don't go crying about the pure and honorable reputation of Chippewa Falls. If you look at history, we are a perfect spot for something like this! "

rosenqef wrote on Dec 31, 2008 5:42 PM:

" I wouldn't be surprised to see this story as the top one again for 2009. I urge the Chippewa Falls community to come together this new year and unite around the cause. May we see a community that puts the well-being of its residents above the profits of the oil industry. Keep fightin' and happy new year! "

LOGIN / REGISTER:

*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

I agree to the terms and conditions

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



MORE News


THIS WEEK'S TOP STORIES


MOST COMMENTED STORIES




Advertisements





Letter to the Editor | Comment about our Website

Copyright © 2009 Chippewa Valley Newspapers. All Rights Reserved.
All Chippewa Valley Newspapers pages are designed for screen resolutions set at 1024x768 or higher.
Click for our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use applicable to this site.