Bowman Hall

Bowman Hall

Interim Chancellor Patrick Guilfoile headshot


A donation from the Menard family to UW-Stout will lead to the expansion of programing at university’s Center for the Study of Institutions and Innovation.

Owners of the Eau Claire-based Menards home improvement stores, the family donated $2.36 million to the Stout University Foundation, UW-Stout Interim Chancellor Patrick Guilfoile announced Wednesday.

“I want to thank the Menard family for this very generous donation and for believing so strongly in the mission of this center,” Guilfoile said in a news release. “This support will allow the center to do even more to fulfill its mission, which is to promote the study and discussion of civil liberties and related institutions and innovations through scholarly inquiry, educational activities and community outreach.”

Tim Shiell headshot


The center, located at 312 Bowman Hall on the UW-Stout campus, will be renamed the Menard Center for the Study of Institutions and Innovation. The center was established in 2017 with a donation from the Charles Koch Foundation and is directed by professor Tim Schiell. It is designed to promote debate and research about civil liberties — such as those in the U.S. Constitution — and look into how those liberties relate to institutions and innovation in government, civic, business, social, scientific and religious settings. The Center for Study of Institutions and Innovation provides programming and hosts speakers, panels and workshops.

“This donation will enable the center to double its support for events and activities at UW-Stout and across the state benefiting thousands of students, faculty, staff and community members,” Shiell said. “I want to thank the Menard family and the Stout University Foundation for their work in putting this agreement together.”

In its first two years of existence the center has sponsored more than 50 events at UW-Stout and more than 200 events across the state.

The agreement language ensures complete control and academic freedom to the university in the operation of the center. The agreement states the gift is intended to “help promote a republic of science at the university, where ideas can be exchanged freely and useful knowledge will benefit the well-being of individuals and society.”

The gift will be contributed in three installments, with the first during the time of the agreement and then $800,000 July 1, 2020, and $800,000 July 1, 2021. The donation funds will be used by the university for the center’s programming.

The center’s programs outlined in the agreement include support for annual symposiums to bring together faculty and students from the across state and the addition of an administrative assistant and student assistants.

The funds also will provide a stipend to both the center director and advisory board members — which is made up of individuals from other state campuses.

“As part of its mission, the University of Wisconsin-Stout is committed to providing an education that will help tomorrow’s leaders solve real world problems,” said the Menard family in a statement. “Free speech and freedom of expression are critical to the innovation and advances that have improved our lives. This center is integral to fulfilling the school’s mission, and we are excited to support it.”

Be the first to know

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

(3) comments


What is a "republic of science... where ideas can be exchanged freely and useful knowledge will benefit the well-being of individuals and society?"

If the goal is to have "... tomorrow’s leaders solve real world problems," what are some examples of "real world problems" that were not being addressed at the University of Wisconsin Stout?

Will "Americans For Prosperity" flourish?

Will the Million-dollar donor club allow us all to benefit or would that be socialism?


"Wisconsin state legislators are renewing their efforts to combat what appears to be a nonexistent problem: the trampling of the campus free-speech rights by hoards of angry students.


No details of these “free speech-related issues” were provided in the memo or in a press release on the bill from Kapenga and Horlacher. All four of the bill’s primary sponsors declined to answer this question: “Are you aware of any occasions involving disruptions of speech at Wisconsin campuses...

In the meantime, the rules adopted by the regents in October 2017 remain in effect. Students who disrupt speech are subject to harsh discipline, ...

The Wisconsin bill is based on a model language drafted by the Goldwater Institute, an Arizona-based right-wing think tank whose funders have included the Bradley, Walton, and Koch foundations. ...

In his testimony in favor of the first Campus Free Speech bill in May 2017, Vos asserted that “intolerance and physical aggression have replaced healthy debate and a free marketplace of ideas” on the nation’s campuses. His sole Wisconsin example of this trend was Shapiro’s talk...."



"A report last year by the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), an outfit that does yeoman's work tracking the threats to free speech in colleges, found that the percentage of institutions with speech codes "that clearly and substantially restrict freedom of speech," a genuine problem in the 1990s, had diminished by 42 percentage points since 2009 in the sample it surveyed. Even better, 37 universities earned its green light rating for having no speech codes whatsoever compared to merely eight in 2009. ...

Conservatives warn day and night about liberal political correctness but give scarcely a thought to how their own brand of patriotic correctness stifles free expression. If they did, they wouldn't be instigating anti-flag-burning amendments on a regular basis. And they certainly wouldn't have stood squarely behind this president when he berated 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick for kneeling during the national anthem to protest police brutality and demanded that the NFL fire him.

Nor are conservative lawmakers shy about launching their own jihad on academic freedom to squelch professors or viewpoints they dislike. ..."


Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.