{{featured_button_text}}

Twenty candidates lined up this week for the first televised debates of the 2020 election. The roster is maxed out, with senators, governors, mayors, and tech entrepreneurs all vying for the chance to take down President Donald Trump.

Rob Montz mug

Montz

There is indeed one Democrat who’s perfectly positioned to do just that. He boasts that elusive mix of progressive bona fides, mainstream appeal, and proven policy track record. But he wasn’t on the stage.

It’s Jimmy Carter, of course.

That’s not entirely a joke. The public perception of Carter is that he’s a one-term loser crushed by the weight of his own naive incompetence. Supposedly just a simple peanut farmer chewed up by Washington, Carter has gone down in history as the poster boy for failed Democratic administrations.

That’s a mistake. Carter actually boasts one of the most impressive presidential policy records of the modern era, a set of accomplishments with broad bipartisan appeal that laid the groundwork for decades of prosperity. The yawning gap between the perception and reality of his administration is the product of our warped relationship with the presidency, the grotesque expectations the public imposes on this office.

Ronald Reagan is lionized as the great deregulator, but some of the most important deregulations of the last half century were actually initiated by Carter. This wasn’t mindless slashing; it was targeted, commonsense reform unleashing competition in parts of the economy long-dominated by artificial monopolies.

We see the fruits of Carter’s labors all around us. A trillion dollar natural gas boom, cheap air travel, countless microbrews, a vast rail and freight infrastructure — these are the direct products of Carter-signed regulatory reforms.

Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon all abused American intelligence agencies to undermine political opponents; Carter championed new oversight of government wiretapping. And in an act of exceptional political self-sacrifice, he backed punishing policies to tame inflation. That produced immense short-term economic pain but laid the monetary foundations for the Reagan-era boom.

Carter also did plenty to please progressives, including creating two new Cabinet agencies. But unlike, say, President Barack Obama, who proudly accepted the Nobel Peace Prize his first year in office and then spent the rest of his term issuing executive orders to kill distant foreigners, Carter was genuinely committed to peace, distinguishing himself as the only modern president not to be at war during any part of his term.

So, why don’t you know any of this? Why have you been taught that Carter’s administration was a failure?

Because, of course, it’s not enough for presidents to simply govern competently. The public demands much more than that.

Over the last century, the presidency has steadily gathered a grotesque messianic mystique. The man in the Oval Office is not just another public servant; he’s the all-powerful father figure, the redeemer of the national soul, the messianic CEO of the economy.

And Carter didn’t fit the role. This is a man who actually read complaints about his presidency live on national television _ and who, at the white-hot peak of stagflation, famously told Americans “to sacrifice your comfort and your ease.”

Carter also intentionally rejected the monarchical trappings of the office: walking alongside the presidential limo in his inaugural parade; carrying his own garment bag off Air Force One; selling the presidential yacht; ordering the Marine Corps band to stop playing “Hail to the Chief” whenever he entered a room. As he later explained: “People want a royal family in the White House. I wasn’t inclined to give them that.”

This approach rendered him helpless when the media machine turned on him. Whether it was the Iran hostage crisis, long gas lines or the “killer rabbit” episode — a flagrant fabrication claiming Carter had been attacked by a wild bayou bunny — scandals metastasized and served as confirmation of his fecklessness.

Of course, most of Carter’s presidential peers fully embraced the cult-like features of the office, seeing nothing wrong with making the president the center of American politics and fully exploiting the public’s appetite for a messianic hero. The modest position originally conceived by the Founders has been transformed into the war-making, news-dominating, flatly unconstitutional monstrosity of today.

President Jimmy Carter is exactly what America needs right now. His was a presidency defined by competently administered bipartisan solutions and an unprecedented effort to scale back the prominence of the office. He’d be the perfect antidote to Trump.

“Carter 2020: Boring Pragmatism You Can Trust.” OK, yes, they’d be nominating a man so old he makes Bernie Sanders seem youthful — and who probably prefers to spend the rest of his days teaching Sunday school. But, please, dream with me.

He is still eligible for one more term.

Be the first to know - Sign up for News Alerts

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Rob Montz is director of We The Internet’s new mini-doc, “Jimmy Carter for 2020” (https://tinyurl.com/y3wmo9al) and CEO of Good Kid Productions. Follow him on Twitter: @robmontz.

1
1
0
0
0

(1) comment

precedent

The only issue is we are now in solidly in the new Gilded Age. The politicians, the office of the President, is only there to make you think you have a choice. You don't. There are only owners and we are not in the big club.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.