Abundance of sand mines in Auburn concern residents

Abundance of sand mines in Auburn concern residents

  • 10
Allan Lindsley

Allan Lindsley stands outside his home on 195th Street in the town of Auburn on Saturday. In back of Lindsley is land Red Flint Sand and Gravel plans to use for a Taylor Creek Transit sand mine. Property due north of Lindsley’s home is the proposed site of Preferred Sands’ 1,224 acre sand mine in Auburn.

TOWN OF AUBURN — Allan Lindsley is the third generation  to live on his family’s farmland in the Town of Auburn. A chiropractor in Eau Claire, he built a home on the land last year, and is planting 2,000 organic blueberry plants that he will be able to see from his kitchen.

From the same window, Lindsley can look about 700 feet away at property where Red Flint Sand and Gravel plans to mine sand from its proposed 35-acre Taylor Creek Transit sand mine.

When Lindsley looks north from his garage, he is able to see where Preferred Sands of Minnesota wants its proposed mammoth 1,224-acre sand mine.

His property could yield a far more lucrative crop than blueberries.

“My house sets on $2 million of sand,” he said.

Nowhere in Chippewa County is the boom in mining frac sand, used in extracting natural gas and oil, more apparent than in the town of Auburn.

The town board is currently grappling with the issue. On Wednesday night it is expected to decide whether to approve developer agreements with three companies proposing mines or issue a six-month moratorium on new mining.

Lindsley wants to see them slow the process by adopting a moratorium.

Even if that happens, it would not affect two existing mines operated by Superior Silica Sands and Western Wisconsin Sand Company.  

The sand mine companies say they are bringing steady jobs to an area that needs them, and the mines will not hurt the environment.

Lindsley said Auburn was picked by the sand companies for a reason.

“The mining companies know that there were no ordinances in place,” he said.

Only seven of Chippewa County’s 23 towns have zoning in place. Auburn is in the majority, with no zoning powers.

Lindsley says he is concerned the sand mines will lead people to move out of town, eroding Auburn’s tax base. He also worries about the residents’ long-term health living near several sand mines and processing plants.

“We will be the test plots for this,” he said.


Get local news delivered to your inbox!

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

WHAT: Town of Auburn Board meeting.

Here is a list of existing and proposed non-metallic mines in the town of Auburn:

Heather Andersen has been a longtime critic of sand mines in Chippewa County. She lives on 190th Street, within three miles of the Superior Si…

“We moved here specifically to be in the country,” said Kate Kerr about her husband Bob and their two daughters, Mary, 5, and Maggie, 3.

Twenty-two years ago, Doug Martin moved to  Auburn so he could live in the Bloomer School District, where he would eventually become district …

It was 16 years ago when Brian and Mary Mawby moved from Eau Claire because of plans to build the North Crossing (Highway 312) on the north si…

Peter May  lives on 52nd Street, about five miles from Preferred Sands’ existing mine in the town of Cooks Valley. His home is about 2.5 miles…

McCarty, 70, lives on 40 acres on the corner of Highway 64 and County Q. She is two miles from the Superior Silica site and a similar distance…

Less than a half mile from Superior Silica Sands’ existing mine is Gerald Nacke’s house.

The property of Lucretia and William Waldbuesser abuts the Preferred Sands mining site, with what would be a direct view of the firm’s washing…

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alerts

Breaking News