Try 1 month for 99¢
Chippewa County Courthouse

This Wednesday, Sept. 23, 2015 photo shows one of the entrances of the Chippewa County Courthouse in Chippewa Falls.

A Wisconsin Court of Appeals decision could open the way for local municipalities to again set residency requirements for their employees.

The city of Chippewa Falls wrestled with the issue for years before the 2013-15 state budget banned local governments from enforcing residency requirements for all but police and firefighters.

However, the state 1st District Court of Appeals threw out that ban July 21, saying the law was aimed at gutting Milwaukee’s residency requirements. The appeals court decision could be appealed to the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

Local officials are split about the possibility of residency requirements resurfacing.

“We have a number of employees who don’t reside in Chippewa County,” County Administrator Frank Pascarella said Wednesday. Some are hourly employees while others are in management.

Pascarella’s address was listed as being Amery in Polk County in a lawsuit brought by Dennis Hunt, a former county finance director. Pascarella said he rents an apartment in Chippewa Falls and that is his residence. He said he has resided in either an apartment or a condominium in Chippewa County since becoming county administrator.

A residency requirement could be a factor in whether some county positions are filled, Pascarella said. “Right now, we’re having a lot of challenges recruiting personnel for a variety of positions,” he said, including in the Highway Department and Sheriff’s Office.

The county’s goal is to be able to provide the best service at the lowest tax rate, he said. If that’s not done, Pascarella said county employees are held accountable by county residents and the Chippewa County Board.

“We’re professionals. And our job is to do what’s in the best interests of the people of Chippewa County,” Pascarella said.

Supervisor Paul Michels, the County Board chairman, does not favor residency requirements for county employees.

“I don’t necessarily agree with residency as being the qualifier for good services being provided by employees,” he said.

He said a county highway department employee who lives in northern part of the city of Eau Claire could get to the county highway shop faster than an employee who lived in northern Chippewa County.

Most people working in county government have cell phones. “We can be in contact with people with the touch of a button,” Michels said.

Residency hasn’t been an issue for employees in the Chippewa Falls School District, School Board President Jerry Smith said.

“I really don’t know what difference it would make,” he said of a residency requirement.

It’s expected the district’s superintendent lives in the school district but that is not required, Smith said.

He said many years ago, when Smith worked as a teacher in the Arkansaw, Wisconsin school district, none of the teachers lived in the district. Instead they lived in nearby Durance and Menomonie, partly because Smith said there was little housing in the area.

“If you had a (residency) requirement for small schools, it would probably destroy them,” Smith said.

Chippewa Falls Mayor Greg Hoffman has worked on residency requirements both as a City Council member and as a mayor.

“I have voiced my concern to our local elected officials that this needs to be determined by local communities. I feel this is a local issue,” he said.

Hoffman said department leaders, those who establish portions of city budgets, should be required to live in the city limits so they have a better understanding of how those taxes impact city residents.

He said while he supports residency requirements for some city employees, he was speaking only about the city and not about what should happen with either Chippewa County or the Chippewa Falls School District.

“I think it’s up to the municipality and-or the county to determine what’s best for their community.” he said.

“I don’t necessarily agree with residency as being the qualifier for good services being provided by employees.” Paul Michels, County Board chairman

Subscribe to Daily Headlines

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

(4) comments


Uh-oh, this could be big trouble for Frank.


Sorry but it sounds like this could cause problems for more people other than just Frank! Thank you very much!

Not stupid a gop

I remember when republicans supported local control and small government . I remember big government control was considered just plain wrong. To all Americans it was Russian ideal with one supreme leader controlling even peoples private parts.. Now it is the law in Wississippi . I remember in a public school we were taught Russia had a lot of stupid behaivior laws and that is why we called them communist. You need permission to pee. Now in scott walker police state you pee in his cup. Russia sounds good next to walkers wisssissippi.
In Russia you could get arrested for walking down the street with out state permission. just like in walkers wississippi Mr Koch your Russian ideals are working for YOU


Can't get people to work for the county because the wages were dropped for non union employees (now there just a training ground and employee's leave for higher wages) and they are not being paid shift differentiail or overtime like they used to be. Not because of any residence laws. I do think employees should have to live within a certain distance to the county not just in the county.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.