Try 3 months for $3

MADISON — Regulations for Wisconsin dog breeders would be eased under a bill being circulated by a Republican lawmaker.

The measure, sponsored by Rep. Don Pridemore, R-Hartford, would significantly raise the number of dogs that may be sold by breeders who don’t have licenses from the state.

It says a dog breeder must sell, or offer to sell, 100 or more dogs in a

year in order to be required to get a license from the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection.

The current limit for those who need licenses is 25 dogs, a policy signed into law in 2009 by former Gov. Jim Doyle in an effort to eliminate “puppy mills” where dogs live in abusive and neglectful conditions.

Assembly Minority Leader Peter Barca, D-Kenosha, called it “unfortunate” that Pridemore would try to change the regulations when “the ink is barely dry on the law.” He accused the GOP lawmaker of trying to “gut the bill completely” by changing the rules and getting rid of several inspectors.

The bill would eliminate the need for three full-time positions, according to the cosponsorship memo.

Pridemore said his goal is not to encourage large, factory-like puppy mills that abuse animals but to make it easier for smaller local breeders, or “hobby breeders,” to operate.

“I tried to change it last session,” he said. “They wouldn’t listen.”

But Scot Ross of the liberal group One Wisconsin Now pounced on the proposal.

“This is another extremist bill from the Republican Legislature that won’t create jobs and serves special interests,” Ross said. “Not content with hurting working families and our children with their draconian cuts, the Republicans are now going after puppies.”

Subscribe to Daily Headlines

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

(3) comments


These legislators really need to get their heads out of their butts. There are enough dogs without homes in rescues/pounds that we don't need to be producing dogs like rabbits.


I think 100 is a bit high but I also think that 25 may be too low. It's obvious that at 25 it creates too many inspector positions that the state cannot afford to have.

Somewhere in the middle there is a compromise on the issue. For any Democrat to stand there and call the Republicans extremists after their years of ramming their agenda down our throats is the quintessential picture of hypocrisy.

The Democrats didn't "compromise" when they pushed the bill through, but now it isn't fair?



Mrlin, If you had ever seen a puppy mill you wouldn't be taling about Reb. vs Dems. Common sense must enter the picture somewhere.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.