A group of Wisconsin legislators is circulating a bill that aims to take public notices out of newspapers and put them instead on government websites — a bad idea that would harm transparency, democracy and public trust.
For more than two centuries, governments in this country have paid newspapers to publish public notices about the actions of government.
Without a third-party, independent source providing the information, there is no accountability, no check-and-balance to make sure that government is posting all the public notices it is required by law to post.
Besides, relatively few people actually use government websites compared to newspaper websites – and relying exclusively on individual government websites does nothing for people who don’t use computers.
Most Wisconsin residents continue to rely on the printed newspaper for information about their local elected governments, as they have for decades.
For those who choose not to use computers, it remains the best source.
For those who use computers, there’s already an invaluable resource at your fingertips.
Since 2005, newspapers in Wisconsin have been digitally archiving every public notice published in every newspaper in our state every day. Today, there is a database with more than a decade worth of information posted on a website that’s free to use, 24/7: www.WisconsinPublicNotices.org.
Wisconsin newspapers collect that information daily, archive and maintain it free of charge. That database is very user-friendly — searchable by city, county, newspaper, Zip code and key word.
This service is provided to citizens, courts and local government free of charge because newspapers in Wisconsin have made a substantial investment to provide and maintain the service for the sake of transparency and public trust.
You have free articles remaining.
Businesses throughout the state use www.WisconsinPublicNotices.org to learn about projects they may wish to bid on. Just ask a contractor how efficient it would be to – every day – log onto the website of every local government in Wisconsin. Eliminating the usefulness of that website wouldn’t be good for business in our state.
So, is this a big money-maker for newspapers – and are newspapers gouging government by charging an exorbitant rate for publishing notices?
That rate barely covers the cost of processing and printing the information. Besides, the rate is regulated by the state – the Department of Administration, to be specific. Most states don’t regulate the rate that newspapers can charge for the service.
To give you an idea how regulated the process is in Wisconsin, just look at the portion of the statute that regulates the type used to print notices: “All legal notices shall be in Arial type face. A standard line shall be 6-point leading without spacing between the lines, and 11 picas in length.”
In fact, it was the newspaper industry in Wisconsin that agreed on a standard type face to help the DOA cut down on its administrative workload. The Wisconsin Legislature approved of that streamlining without opposition in 2012.
The process of publishing public notices is more regulated in Wisconsin than in most states. With that said, only one state – Utah – briefly eliminated the requirement of publication, and it was a failure.
It’s also important to note that government isn’t the sole bearer of the cost of publishing legal notices. In many cases, the cost is passed along by the government agency to those who are seeking government action.
As Beth Bennett, executive director of the Wisconsin Newspaper Association, has testified: “A notice for a new license is passed along to the new licensee. Foreclosure notices are assumed by the banks and the attorneys handling the foreclosure. Court notices are passed along by the courts to the subject of the legal matter; and in many instances, public notices are required to be placed by John Q. Citizen who pays directly for the publication of the notice. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources has such notices.”
Taking public notices out of newspapers is just another attempt by government officials to curb government transparency in Wisconsin.